Restoration logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Restoration logo
  • NEWS
  • PRODUCTS
    • New Products & Technologies
    • Submit Your Product
    • Interactive Product Spotlights
  • EDUCATION
    • KnowHow.
    • Podcasts
    • Trade Shows & Expos
    • Training & Certification
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
  • TOPICS
    • Water Damage
    • Fire & Smoke Damage
    • Mold
    • Contamination
    • Odor
    • Contents
    • Architecture
    • Catastrophe
    • Cleaning
  • BUSINESS
    • Managing Your Business
    • Insurance/Legal Matters
  • BUYER'S GUIDE
  • VIDEOS
    • Ask Annissa
    • Ask the Expert
    • Ironclad Marketing Minute
    • TradeTalks
    • Video Channel
  • INFOCENTER
    • Mold and Mycotoxins
  • THE EXPERIENCE
    • Conference & Exhibition
    • Convention & Trade Show
    • R&R Special Issue
  • EMAG
    • eMagazine
    • Archive Issues
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • SIGN UP
Insurance/Legal Matters in Restoration

Toxic Mold Litigation: 2013 Update (Part I)

Mold lawsuits remain plentiful and large recoveries still occur, although they have not wielded the devastation to the restoration industry that many had feared

By Edward H. Cross Esq., "The Restoration Lawyer", Julie B. Isen Esq.
toxic mold on wall
toxic mold on wall mold spores
toxic mold on wall mold spores
toxic mold on wall mold spores
toxic mold on wall
toxic mold on wall mold spores
toxic mold on wall mold spores
toxic mold on wall mold spores
August 7, 2013

Your Fears Realized

Customer comes home from vacation and notices a leak in the roof after a large rainstorm. Customer calls you to dry the structure and fix the leak. While you’re working, you happen to miss some water that has found its way down to the baseboard. Whoops. The customer later finds some mold around the unwanted water down below the leak. All of a sudden, the customer panics. MOLD?!? She can feel the mold spores growing in her lungs and is sure it’s going to be fatal. She’s seen the news programs, so she is an expert. There has never been any hint of mold in her home, ever. She has never had allergies, but she will now. In fact, the customer has never had any real problems until you ruined her perfect life.  

If you’re lucky, you might get one phone call before you receive the Summons and Complaint. How will you address this? The first thing is try, within the bounds of reason, to make her happy because happy customers don’t file lawsuits.

Big Settlements

Mold lawsuits remain plentiful and large recoveries still occur, although they have not wielded the devastation to the restoration industry that many had feared. Large jury verdicts for mold claims are extremely rare, but the cases are expensive to litigate, which increases their settlement (nuisance) value.

In 2013, the City of Temple City, Texas, recovered $7.25 million to settle a case against the contractors and architects involved in the original construction of the nearly-new City Police Department Headquarters. Voters had passed an $11 million bond to build the headquarters and were less-than-pleased to learn it would cost $6 to $8 million to remediate the mold inside. 

Construction was completed in 2005. Mold and other issues arose and sampling confirmed the presence of mold growth in 2009. However, the testing did not show molds commonly associated with significant health risks. Perhaps due to lack of urgency since the mold was not supposed to harm anyone, the architect and the contractors who built allegedly failed to offer a satisfactory plan to correct the problem. Remediators, heed this warning: Do not rely on mold testing to determine whether or not you should remediate a mold problem. Like Nike says: Just do it.  

In 2010, out of frustration with the architect and the contractor, the City filed suit in an effort to get them to address the heating and cooling systems thought to be the cause of the mold problems. The suit alleged negligence, breach of contract and associated damages. If you ever needed a reason to act swiftly to remediate any mold issues that may be associated with work you have done, this is it. Remember, it is best to remediate the mold quickly and on your own terms than be dragged through a multi-year lawsuit because the mold found on the property may not have been considered “toxic.”  

Construction lawsuits are typically complex and involve numerous parties, which tend to make lawsuits last longer than other civil cases, and much more expensive. In this case, there were nearly 20 parties to the lawsuit.  

While the lawsuit was ongoing, in 2011, Temple City used taxpayer dollars to renovate the building and remediate the mold. About $5.3 million of the settlement will go to paying back the money spent on mold remediation. The Temple City police are back in the building now, and no new problems have been reported. 

How are Mold Claims Proven in Court? 

The answer to that varies by state, but here is a brief overview on the issue. Expert testimony can be tricky, particularly when it comes to mold-related health claims.  

There are two main tests for expert testimony in court. Most states follow what is called the “Daubert Test.” This multi-factor, more stringent test states that if scientific, technical or specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact, an expert may testify if the theory or technique can be or has been tested; whether it has been subject to peer review and publication; whether, in respect to a particular technique, there is a high known or potential rate of error and whether there are standards controlling the technique’s operation; and whether the theory or technique enjoys “general acceptance” within a “relevant scientific community.” This can create a major burden for a poorly-funded plaintiff’s lawyer, especially if he is faced with a vigorous defense.

In California and a few other states, the older Kelly/Frye test for experts is still being used. Under that test, evidence is admissible if it is based on a scientific technique generally accepted as reliable in the scientific community. This is clearly a much less difficult hurdle to jump.  

With regards to mold, these tests can easily go either way. Mold is, after all, everywhere, and everyone reacts to it differently. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) acknowledge that there are no recognized standards for the amount of mold or time of exposure that will cause symptoms. The CDC also recognizes that mold exposure can present health problems. So, how does one get from “no recognized standards” to an injury proven in a court of law to be caused by mold?

In an unpublished 2009 opinion, the New Jersey Appellate Court utilized the less stringent test to reverse a summary judgment by the trial court based on testimony from the Plaintiff’s doctor. Smith v. Northridge at Edison No. A-2482-07 (N.J. App. Div. Oct. 6, 2009). The doctor claimed that although his job is not to investigate, the facts given to him by the plaintiff led him to believe that the symptoms she suffered from were the result of mold in her apartment. The facts relevant for the doctor were that there was some type of mold present, her symptoms started when the water intrusion and mold growth occurred, and then ended when she left the apartment.  

Is it generally accepted as reliable in the medical community that a doctor interprets the evidence given to him by a patient to come to the conclusion that the patient is suffering from a reaction to mold? The court in Smith believed it to be. That same testimony would likely not pass muster in another state since there seems to be a high potential rate of error.

In a more recent case in New York, an appeals court set new precedent that may open the door for more lawsuits based on illnesses related to mold exposure. The plaintiff suffered from dizziness, a rash, congestion and other issues. The results from the studies relied on by the plaintiff were “statistically significant, meaning the strength of the association was sufficient to conclude, within the rage of probability, that exposure to mold caused the identified ill-health risks.” In a nod to the acceptability of scientific evidence used in court, the appeals court stated that “scientists do not report their results in terms of black and white causality, but rather, in terms of the strengths of the associations found.” The Court did not rule that the mold caused the plaintiff’s illness, just that the case could go forward to a jury for them to decide. Cornell v. 360 W. 51st Street Realty, (2012). Could this be the beginning of a new wave of mold-related health claims? It could certainly affect the way judges in New York view evidence brought before them in these cases.

Mold is Mold is Mold

The exact effects these fungi have on humans are still being studied, and in our opinion, will not be fully understood during our lifetimes. Many of the published studies have been criticized for publication biases, inadequate sample sizes, poor controls and more. Crafty attorneys all over the country have attempted to use these studies in court. Sometimes experts are permitted to testify about them. Other times they are prohibited from testifying at all on grounds that they are relying on “junk science.” The best way to win in court is to avoid going there altogether.

For remediation purposes, it is technically not important to determine what type of mold you are dealing with. All mold should be treated the same. Mold spores enter into buildings in similar ways, no matter the type of mold. They can enter through doorways, windows, HVAC systems, people, animals, clothing, etc. There are many materials in buildings that provide suitable nutrients for mold growth such as gypsum board, ceiling tiles, wood, paper, cardboard, etc.

In Part II of this series on toxic mold litigation, I’ll cover how a jury is likely to react to mold evidence, how to be proactive in mold situations and what to do when litigation cannot be avoided. Be sure to check it out in the September R&R.

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Ed cross headshot

Ed Cross, “The Restoration Lawyer,” represents restorers nationwide from offices in Palm Desert, California and Honolulu, Hawaii. His firm drafts restoration contracts, collects money for restorers and represents them in litigation. He is the Restoration Contractor Advocate for the Restoration Industry Association. He can be reached at (760) 773-4002 or by email at Ed@EdCross.com. For information about how to document a file to accelerate collections, visit EdCross.com/collections. 

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
To unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • mold remediation

    Fighting Mold and Bacteria Damage

    Successful mold remediation can be multidisciplinary,...
    Mold Remediation
    By: Josh Woolen
  • certifications and licenses for restoration professionals

    Certifications and Licenses Every Restoration Company Needs

    Restoration companies need to make sure they have the...
    Restoration Training/Education
    By: Sharon Elzarat
  • a wall covered in moss and fungus

    Zero Tolerance for Toxic Molds: Essential Steps for Successful Remediation

    Understanding the importance of zero tolerance for toxic...
    Mold Remediation
    By: Michael A. Pinto CSP, SMS, CMP, RTPE, FLS, ERS and Kendra Seymour
You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Report Abusive Comment

Subscribe For Free!
  • eNewsletter
  • Online Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service
  • Manage My Preferences

More Videos

Popular Stories

wall cavity drying

Dry or Demolish? Navigating the Complexities of Wall Cavity Restoration

Ask the Expert: Unlocking Efficiency in Water Damage Restoration

Unlocking Efficiency in Water Damage Restoration

Ask the Expert: Catastrophe Panel - Back to the Basics Part 1

Catastrophe Panel – Back to the Basics Part 1

Submit Your New Product/Technology to R&R!

Would you like to promote a new restoration, remediation or cleaning product/technology with Restoration & Remediation? Fill out the question below to start your submission:

Events

September 3, 2025

The Experience Convention and Trade Show

The Experience Convention & Trade Show logoJoin us in Las Vegas for The Experience Convention & Trade Show, the leading event for cleaning, restoration, and remediation pros, packed with hands-on demos, expert speakers, and high-impact networking. Happening September 3–5, 2025 at Caesars Forum—this is where the industry comes to learn, connect, and grow!

View All Submit An Event

Poll

Restoration Services

What restoration/remediation service do you prioritize most?
View Results Poll Archive

Products

The Cleaning, Restoration, Inspection, and Safety Glossary

The Cleaning, Restoration, Inspection, and Safety Glossary

The Cleaning, Restoration, Inspection, and Safety Glossary.

See More Products

Related Articles

  • cross court toxi mold litigation

    Toxic Mold Litigation: 2013 Update (Part II)

    See More
  • Cross_1

    The “Contract Wars” – Part II

    See More
  • contract_wars_FT

    The “Contract Wars” – Part III

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • Water Damage - Part 1.pdf

    Water Damage - Mitigation & Restoration, Volume I - Management & Marketing

  • fires out.jpg

    Fire’s Out, Now What? Vol. I & II

  • Water-Damage---Part-2.gif

    Water Damage - Mitigation & Restoration Volume II - Technical Procedures

See More Products

Events

View AllSubmit An Event
  • April 9, 2013

    Mold Remediation Symposium

    The Mold Remediation Symposium is a one-time event that has been created in response to Superstorm Sandy, and will train attendees in the cleaning, restoration, remediation of mold.
View AllSubmit An Event

Related Directories

  • Rytech Restoration of the Midlands

    No one plans for the destruction caused by water, fire or mold, but when it happens, the team at Rytech Restoration of The Midlands is here to help. Our certified specialists provide 24/7 emergency service to get you and your Columbia SC home or business back to normal as quickly as possible. From residential homes to commercial buildings, we specialize in mold remediation, water damage restoration, and fire and smoke damage cleanup. Our live specialists are ready to answer your questions and dispatch a local specialist to your door. Schedule a free inspection and estimate today!
×

Stay ahead of the curve with our eNewsletters.

Get the latest industry updates tailored your way.

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Store
    • Want More
    • Submit a Press Release
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • eNewsletters
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Reprints
    • Marketing Services
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2025. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing