These rebuttals to Chuck Dewald’s paper titled "Enthalpy Evaporation Evaluation – A Case for the E3 Drying Metric," delve into concerns raised by industry experts regarding the validity of the E3 metric as a universal tool for evaluating water damage mitigation. Dewald claims that the E3 metric provides a solution for accurately predicting evaporation rates under any ambient condition. However, the peer review uncovered several issues with the whitepaper’s methodology, including unsupported data, ambiguous terminology and a lack of scientific validation. The rebuttals emphasize the importance of sound science in water damage mitigation and urges further research to ensure that proposed standards can be reliably applied in real-world restoration scenarios. These papers serve as a call for caution and rigorous testing before adopting new metrics in the restoration industry.

Download the Rebuttals below