Restoration logo
search
cart
facebook twitter linkedin youtube
  • Sign In
  • Create Account
  • Sign Out
  • My Account
Restoration logo
  • NEWS
  • PRODUCTS
    • New Products & Technologies
    • Submit Your Product
    • Interactive Product Spotlights
  • EDUCATION
    • KnowHow.
    • Podcasts
    • Trade Shows & Expos
    • Training & Certification
    • Webinars
    • Whitepapers
  • TOPICS
    • Water Damage
    • Fire & Smoke Damage
    • Mold
    • Contamination
    • Odor
    • Contents
    • Architecture
    • Catastrophe
    • Cleaning
    • Safety
  • BUSINESS
    • Managing Your Business
    • Insurance/Legal Matters
  • BUYER'S GUIDE
  • VIDEOS
    • Ask the Expert
    • TradeTalks
    • Video Channel
  • THE EXPERIENCE
    • Convention & Trade Show
    • R&R Special Issue
  • EMAG
    • eMagazine
    • Archive Issues
    • Contact
    • Advertise
  • SIGN UP
Water Damage RestorationRestoration Training/Education

Stop Using the “Drink Test” for Water Loss Classification

Water damage categories are about contamination, not whether you’d drink it or not.

By Lorne McIntyre CR
A flooded basement after an irrigation leak
Credit: Ethen Dell / iStock / Getty Images Plus
January 5, 2026

I was on a water loss this week, standing in a kitchen looking at a clean break on a supply line under the sink. The contractor looked at the puddle on the floor and said, “I wouldn’t drink that. It’s a Category 3.” One of the technicians nodded and repeated a line that gets used a lot on jobs: “If you wouldn’t drink the water, it’s not Category 1.” It sounded logical to them on the surface, but I knew it was not how the ANSI/IICRC S500 defines categories of water. I also knew that when scope, PPE and pricing are based on a “drink test,” the project is off the standard and the restorer is opening the door to challenges from adjusters, TPAs and consultants. 

So, I started walking them through the loss. I told them the standard does not care whether anyone would pour a glass and drink from the loss water. It classifies water based on where it came from, what it comes into contact within the building, how long it has been present and at what temperature and whether contaminants are present that would not normally be expected in a typical indoor environment. In simple terms, the category of water is about the level of contamination, not personal preference or appearance. Technicians and project managers are expected to think about undesirable substances in the water that can impact health through skin contact, breathing or ingestion, cause damage to the structure, systems and contents or interfere with the normal operation of building systems. That is a very different test than “Would you drink it?” 

We walked over to the broken supply line, and I explained that Category 1 water starts from a sanitary source and is not expected to pose a substantial risk from normal dermal, inhalation or incidental ingestion exposure when handled using appropriate controls. I gave them examples they see every week — broken pressurized water supply lines, tub or sink overflows with no added contaminants, appliance failures involving the supply line, rainwater entering directly without contacting contamination and toilet tank breaks and bowl overflows that contain only clean water without added waste or chemicals. In this kitchen loss, the water came from a cold-water supply line under the sink. That is a textbook Category 1 source. It does not instantly become Category 3 just because it splashed on a cabinet toe-kick or because the contractor does not feel like drinking it. 

At the same time, I didn’t want them to think Category 1 stays clean forever. As we traced the migration across the floor, I reminded them that Category 1 does not stay Category 1 forever. The standard states clearly that Category 1 water can deteriorate. Category 1 water that flows into a clean, uncontaminated space does not immediately change category. However, if that same water flows into an area that is already contaminated, such as a crawlspace with feces and animal activity, a mechanical room with oily residues or a bathroom with visible contamination, the category can change immediately because the water has now contacted unsanitary materials. As time and temperature increase, surfaces and dust get wet, microorganisms begin to multiply and the category can shift higher. Odors, visible growth and obvious soil loading are all signs that water which started clean has deteriorated. 

Watching the crew inspect the affected area, I tried to give them a simple mindset they could use on every job. A good field mindset is to ask the right questions: 

  • What was the actual source? 
  • What surfaces and cavities did the water contact as it travelled? 
  • How long has it been wet and at what approximate temperature? 
  • Are there visible contaminants like feces, heavy soiling, organic waste or oily residues? 
  • Are there conditions that clearly rise above what would be considered normal for an indoor environment? 

Those answers drive the category determination, not individual comfort levels about drinking it.

To drive the point home, I used examples from everyday life. I asked them if they would drink from a toilet tank. Almost nobody would, yet the tank is filled from the same potable supply as the kitchen sink. That water is still Category 1 at the source until it contacts contamination in the bowl or drain line. The same applies to shower heads and laundry supply lines; they are fed by potable water, but no one fills their water bottle from them. The fact that someone is uncomfortable drinking from a fixture says nothing about the ANSI/IICRC S500 category of the water. On the other side, some people would drink swimming pool water, but that water contains chemicals and potential contaminants and is not classified just because a few people are willing to sip it. The willingness of a person to drink from a source is subjective and highly variable, so it is not a reliable or professional classification tool.  

One of the project managers asked, “What about testing? When do we need a lab to tell us the category?” That opened the door to another important lesson. For technicians and project managers, it is also important to understand where lab testing fits. If someone insists that Category 1 water from a clean supply line has become Category 3 at the moment of discovery, they should be able to justify that position. That justification normally comes from either clear visual evidence of gross contamination, such as sewage, rising groundwater, heavily contaminated soil, organic sludge or from sampling and laboratory results that confirm contamination far beyond what is typical indoors. Most jobs will never require lab work, and that is acceptable. The standard is written so restorers can make responsible, defensible decisions in the field without sending every sample to a lab. However, if no sampling is being done, then the only appropriate way to classify is to follow the ANSI/IICRC S500 logic on source, contact, time and temperature instead of guessing based on “I wouldn’t drink that.”  

By the time we finished walking the job, we had essentially built a repeatable process they could take to the next site. In day-to-day field practice, a practical process looks like this. Start with the source. If the water is from a known sanitary supply and the affected area is otherwise clean, the loss begins as Category 1. Walk the path of the water. Trace where it went, which materials it touched, and whether it entered areas like crawlspaces, unfinished utility rooms or obviously contaminated spaces. Check the clock and the climate. A fresh break discovered within a few hours in a conditioned home is not the same as water sitting for several days in a hot, closed-up structure. Pay attention to conditions such as musty odors, visible microbial growth or heavy soil that indicates deterioration. Finally, document everything. Good photos, written notes describing contamination, odors, pre-existing dirt or growth and temperature conditions are all part of a defensible file.  

Before I left, I told the project manager that when they decide water has deteriorated to Category 2 or Category 3, they need to explain why in writing. They should reference the source, what the water contacted and the time and temperature factors, rather than simply stating that they or the client would not drink it. This helps their documentation stand up to review from insurers, TPA’s and consultants and it also helps their own team understand the reasoning and apply it consistently on future losses.  

Driving away from the site, I thought about how often that same scene plays out on different projects: someone looks at a puddle, shrugs and says, “I wouldn’t drink that,” and the category jumps without any reference to the standard. When technicians and project managers stop relying on the “drink test” and start consistently using the standard, scopes become more consistent, PPE and engineering controls are better matched to the actual risk and the company’s credibility as a professional restoration firm increases. Whether you are dealing with a clean kitchen supply-line break or a severe sewage backup, categorizing water based on source, contact, time, temperature and contamination is what keeps the work aligned with the ANSI/IICRC S500 and protects both workers and building occupants.
KEYWORDS: IICRC Standards industry standards

Share This Story

Looking for a reprint of this article?
From high-res PDFs to custom plaques, order your copy today!

Lorne mcintyre headshot   square

Lorne McIntyre is a veteran of the cleaning and restoration industry and Principal Technical Consultant at Restoration Advisor, a consulting firm in Toronto. A dynamic educator, he teaches in the Disaster Recovery Program at Humber College and trains restorers as both an RIA Technical Trainer and IICRC Approved Instructor with Restoration Science Academy. Lorne holds all three IICRC Master Certifications along with RIA’s highest designations—Certified Restorer (CR). He has also contributed his expertise on numerous IICRC and RIA committees and industry publications. Contact: lorne@disaster-education.com

Recommended Content

JOIN TODAY
To unlock your recommendations.

Already have an account? Sign In

  • mold remediation

    Fighting Mold and Bacteria Damage

    Successful mold remediation can be multidisciplinary,...
    Contamination Restoration & Remediation​
    By: Josh Woolen
  • certifications and licenses for restoration professionals

    Certifications and Licenses Every Restoration Company Needs

    Restoration companies need to make sure they have the...
    Restoration Training/Education
    By: Sharon Elzarat
  • a wall covered in moss and fungus

    Zero Tolerance for Toxic Molds: Essential Steps for Successful Remediation

    Understanding the importance of zero tolerance for toxic...
    Mold Remediation
    By: Michael A. Pinto CSP, SMS, CMP, RTPE, FLS, ERS and Kendra Seymour
You must login or register in order to post a comment.

Report Abusive Comment

Manage My Account
  • Newsletters
  • Online Registration
  • Subscription Customer Service
  • Manage My Preferences

More Videos

Popular Stories

soft skills

Closing the Restoration Skills Gap with Training for Tech, AI and Customer Care

Q&A: How to Protect Belongings During Winter Freeze and Burst Pipe Season

How to Protect Belongings During Winter Freeze and Burst Pipe Season

restoration technician in full PPE cleaning Containment

Why the Restoration Industry Must Refocus on Cleaning and Remove the Chemical Crutch

Women in Restoration award nominations open - Submit Yours Now!

Events

January 20, 2026

INTRCONNECT

Dive into the latest trends, innovations, and best practices shaping the future of property insurance and restoration.

April 27, 2026

RIA Convention & Expo

This event empowers professionals through world-class education, powerful networking, and access to cutting-edge tools and services.

View All Submit An Event

Poll

Technology Innovations

Which emerging technology do you believe will have the biggest impact on restoration work in the next 5 years?
View Results Poll Archive

Products

The Cleaning, Restoration, Inspection, and Safety Glossary

The Cleaning, Restoration, Inspection, and Safety Glossary

The Cleaning, Restoration, Inspection, and Safety Glossary.

See More Products
Prepare for CATASTROPHE with R&R!

Related Articles

  • a house consumed in smoke and fire

    Winning the Battle Against Smoke Odors: A Guide for Fire Restoration Technicians

    See More
  • Flooded Basement Day 1

    Extraction: The Overlooked Key to Faster, More Effective Restorative Drying

    See More
  • Weekly Hands-On How-To: How to Test for Smoke Residue After a Fire Loss

    How to Test for Smoke Residue After a Fire Loss

    See More

Related Products

See More Products
  • Cover.jpg

    How To Get More Water Damage Jobs (ebook)

  • Water-Damage---Part-2.gif

    Water Damage - Mitigation & Restoration Volume II - Technical Procedures

  • Water Damage - Part 1.pdf

    Water Damage - Mitigation & Restoration, Volume I - Management & Marketing

See More Products
×

Stay ahead of the curve with our newsletters.

Get the latest industry updates tailored your way.

JOIN TODAY!
  • RESOURCES
    • Advertise
    • Contact Us
    • Directories
    • Store
    • Want More
    • Submit a Press Release
  • SIGN UP TODAY
    • Create Account
    • Newsletters
    • Customer Service
    • Manage Preferences
  • SERVICES
    • Reprints
    • Marketing Services
    • Market Research
    • List Rental
    • Survey/Respondent Access
  • STAY CONNECTED
    • LinkedIn
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • X (Twitter)
  • PRIVACY
    • PRIVACY POLICY
    • TERMS & CONDITIONS
    • DO NOT SELL MY PERSONAL INFORMATION
    • PRIVACY REQUEST
    • ACCESSIBILITY

Copyright ©2026. All Rights Reserved BNP Media.

Design, CMS, Hosting & Web Development :: ePublishing